![]() 11/03/2017 at 12:40 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
made bearable
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 11/03/2017 at 12:54 |
|
You fixed the rear suspension too, right?
![]() 11/03/2017 at 12:55 |
|
obviously...
![]() 11/03/2017 at 13:09 |
|
Ive always thought these were cool...
![]() 11/03/2017 at 13:16 |
|
Now do the 2017
![]() 11/03/2017 at 13:32 |
|
I... have tried.
no ideas to make is acceptable as yet.
![]() 11/03/2017 at 13:39 |
|
now we’re talking
![]() 11/03/2017 at 14:18 |
|
https://jalopnik.com/this-madman-is-stuffing-a-new-honda-civic-type-r-motor-1820092729
This guy figure it out
![]() 11/03/2017 at 14:43 |
|
I dont understand the hate for this gen of civic, I really like them.
![]() 11/03/2017 at 15:06 |
|
I think the hate was MOSTLY about the tech, rather than the look.
but yeah, I thought the rear always looked off, and just felt moving the wing could REALLY help
![]() 11/03/2017 at 15:24 |
|
Yeah, it’s more mechanical than aesthetic. These made the same power as the North American Si’s, and had a solid rear axle. The JDM and North American Civics at least had independent rear. In Japan, where both the FD2 (sedan) and this version were sold, the FD2 is routinely twice as much on the used market in the same condition.
![]() 11/03/2017 at 20:36 |
|
Wasn’t this the CTR with a solid axle?... if so I think that explains it all...
![]() 11/03/2017 at 23:28 |
|
yes, all the tech and savvy of a chrysler town and countru
![]() 11/04/2017 at 08:15 |
|
needs to be lower
![]() 11/06/2017 at 12:00 |
|